Grammaticality. 13‏/10‏/2022 ... It is unclear whether, how and where la...

1 Answer. Both versions are perfectly fine. I will

This sentence is an example of Conjunction Reduction, the syntactic rule that deletes repeated material in conjoined constituents, for example. Bill washed the dishes and swept the floor. Bill washed and dried the dishes. The relative clause modifying project in the original sentence is the focus, so let's get it out of a subordinate clause and ...Grammaticality judgments and decision times for two age groups of normally developing children were studied to determine when parsing decisions are made and how linguistic knowledge affects parsing. Children showed very good sensitivity to grammatical violations, although at somewhat lower levels than those reported for college-age students ...All three are acceptable and in use. The form that is selected might vary, depending on what X, Y, and Z are, how the sentence is punctuated, what verb is in the sentence, and what preposition is used (other prepositions could be used, besides for, such as to, by, or on). "In the case of fixed capital, 1973-78 growth rates are close to 1973-76 rates both for total capital input and capital ...10. Between those two sets of choices specifically, the first is correct. However, using 'our side'/'your side' isn't the part that's wrong in the second examples, it's the preposition: you can be at an end, but you are on a side. So you could say "Everything is fine on our side." Share. Improve this answer. Follow. edited Apr 9, 2012 at 13:31.Both are semantically correct as they are. But compare. I'll send it to you. and. I'll send it you. The second sentence wouldn't make sense in formal writing, but is found to be understandable in northern England spoken usage.We manipulated the factors' grammaticality (grammatical versus ungrammatical) and local coherence (locally coherent versus not locally coherent). Grammaticality ..."I don't like it either" is the most common way a native English speaker would express this sentiment. "I don't like it too" and "I don't like it also" are generally seen as improper because, arranged this way, there's a contradiction between the negative "don't" and the inclusive "too"/"also"; the statement seems to reject and affirm at the same time. Contrary to that, "I also don't like it ...Apr 24, 2018 · grammaticality-in-context; politeness; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 24, 2018 at 10:50. Jessica Tiberio. 417 2 2 silver badges 13 13 bronze badges ... That grammatical sentences and their interpretation form the building blocks of linguistic theories is not controversial. Yet, the collection of articles in the present Research Topic shows that the notion of (un)grammaticality, on the one hand, and the observations of (un)acceptability ratings, on the other, can entertain in fact rather complex interactions.Free grammar checker to fix punctuation, commas, sentences, essays, paragraphs & contextual mistakes. Correct all your grammatical errors now!Lesion analysis revealed that posterior temporal areas were more reliably implicated in poor grammaticality judgment performance than anterior areas, but poor performance was also observed with some anterior lesions, suggesting that areas important for syntactic processing are distributed throughout the left peri-sylvian region.For an epitaph, would you write: Her joy and love of life continue to inspire us all or Her joy and love of life continues to inspire us all TIA"Indeed" can start a sentence as either a conjunction or an interjection. As a conjunction, indeed provides emphasis or indicates that the sentence is an example of, or evidence for, a claim made in the previous sentence. As an interjection, indeed indicates surprise or sarcastic doubt. In this use, indeed is often the only word in the sentence.He thinks she'll marry him?There are many factually accurate ways to refer to your mother in converstation with a sibling: "my mom," "our mom," "your mom," "our brother's mom" (if you have another sibling), "Dad's wife," "Grandma's daughter," "Our uncle's sister," "Gertrude," "the queen of Denmark," etc. Each of these names and descriptions is factually accurate, but ...It's the object of "part", with "death" as the subject of that verb. In modern English, the phrase would be rendered something like "until death parts us," not "until we part at death." – Alex. Jan 2, 2011 at 21:50. @nohat: the answer does not say anything about 'do part' instead of 'part', that is 'do/does/did' used in positive sentences for ...In both cases the answer is not a work assignment ("you should do such and such") but yes or no. "Yes I can tell you" or "Yes I could tell you." Most likely if it is a polite question, "could" would probably be more appropriate, though they are used pretty much interchangeably in casual speech. To answer just "yes" or "no" would be strictly ...Aug 4, 2019 · Grammaticality Literature British English Literary English. 06/29/19. Is it possible to use present and past in one sentence? > In *On The Road* Jack admits to Justin ... As you found in your research, this may be dialectal. In British English, the is required to turn following into an adjective, rather than having it parsed as a verb. In following [something] → the something is being followed In the following [something] → the something follows In following their officers’ orders, the Light Brigade charged into …To express the imperative form of using care about something, the following constructions may be used: "Be careful that <action>" ("action" is a standalone sentence with "you" as the subject)As nouns the difference between grammaticality and acceptability. is that grammaticality is the state or attribute of obeying the rules of grammar; grammatical correctness while acceptability is the quality of being acceptable; acceptableness.grammaticality; negation; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 26, 2020 at 8:11. help-info.de. 2,537 1 1 gold badge 13 13 silver badges 22 22 bronze badges. asked Apr 26, 2020 at 2:58. Ashitaka Ashitaka. 63 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. Add a comment |"Grammaticality" is not about speakers, it is about the abstract grammar that describes a language – does the grammar generate the output. However, there is a tendency (more than minor) for linguists to slip from acceptability to grammaticality. Practitioners of generative grammar view linguistic behavior as deriving from abstract …In linguistics, grammaticality is determined by the conformity to language usage as derived by the grammar of a particular speech variety. The notion of grammaticality rose alongside the theory of generative grammar, the goal of which is to formulate rules that define well-formed, grammatical, sentences. These rules of grammaticality also provide explanations of ill-formed, ungrammatical ...Acceptability and grammaticality. The goal of acceptability rating studies is to gather insights into the mental grammars of participants. As the grammaticality of a linguistic construction is an abstract construct that cannot be accessed directly, this type of tasks is usually not called grammaticality, but acceptability judgment. This can be ...This is a sentence from a short story I'm writing: "It's all the same to me, because when it comes to our deepest fears and insecurities, we are all alone."May 9, 2016 · Perhaps next time, tag for both grammaticality and grammar, lest your nonconformity to tagging etiquette irk the ire of those who would accuse you of opportunistic pendanticality. "A speaker's linguistic competence, which is the knowledge that they have of their language, allows them to easily judge whether a sentence is grammatical or ... The two mean slightly different things. "Expectations of something" means what you expect that something to do or achieve. "Expectations for something" are more vague and only mean expectations in that area. So "expectations of college" might be that it would provide me with the education I need to start my career.J.R.: Yes, I didn't want to clog up the answer itself with that level of detail, but when the word "the" is part of the "the one side/hand" juxtaposed with "the other side/hand", most of the instances with "hand" are exactly OP's context, but very few of the (far less common anyway) instances of "side" are actually for that "weighing up of alternatives" sense.Cost noun. 1 An amount that has to be paid or spent to buy or obtain something: we are able to cover the cost of the event health-care costs. [mass noun]: the tunnel has been built at no cost to the state. 1.1 The effort, loss, or sacrifice necessary to achieve or obtain something: the government succeeded in diverting resources away from ...Jan 25, 2014 at 7:28. "When it comes after to, it will always be a form of whom." This isn't correct. In this case, "whomever" happens to be grammatical because it's the object of the relative clause "whomever it may concern." But in another context, such as "to whoever was there," the pronoun might be the subject of the relative clause, and in ...Grammaticality Judgment This subtest assesses the examinee's ability to identify grammatically incorrect or correct sentences. Following identification of an incorrect sentence, the examinee is required to fix one word of the sentence without altering the overall sentence meaning. The sentence is provided orally with no supplemental pictures.May 15, 2014 · grammaticality; prepositions; word-order; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 15, 2014 at 11:03. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges ... GRAMMATICALITY AND UNGRAMMATICALITY IN OPTIMALrrY THEORY. 2.1. What it means to be grammatical. In the earliest instantiations of g phonology, constraints ...Markers of definiteness and indefiniteness generally indicate whether or not the addressee is expected to be able to identify the referent of a noun phrase (see Krámský 1972, Hawkins 1978, Heine ...You can use "Back in 2000" at the beginning of the sentence, at the end of the sentence, or any position inbetween. Back in 2000, when Larry Smarr left his job as head of a celebrated supercomputer center in Illinois to start a new institute at the University of California, San Diego, and the University of California, Irvine, he rarely paid attention to his bathroom scale.May 20, 2015 · Grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs) have been used to elicit data reflecting second language (L2) speakers’ knowledge of L2 grammar. However, the exact constructs measured by GJTs, whether primarily implicit or explicit knowledge, are disputed and have been argued to differ depending on test-related variables (i.e., time pressure and item grammaticality). They're called ill-formed idioms or extragrammatical idioms. How's things is one; it's in a colloquial register, in my opinion - you wouldn't use it in a scientific paper, for instance. It's us is a similar 'wrong agreement' idiom, widely accepted in almost every register. There are many extragrammatical idioms breaking various 'laws', for ...grammaticality; phrases; word-usage; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 15, 2013 at 11:28. hattenn. asked May 15, 2013 at 10:27. hattenn hattenn. 235 1 1 gold badge 3 3 silver badges 9 9 bronze badges. 6. Let's assume you're speaking to the right person, not a receptionist. If you're going to ask for something on behalf of a client ...phrasally. dramatically. artistically. formally. technically. “Please forgive all the horrible grammatical errors in this piece, since I had to correct it myself.”. Adverb. . Adverb for well formed; in accordance with the rules of the grammar of a language.2. It's correct. It means to exaggerate in a way which is inappropriate (ly excessive) for the circumstances. Exaggeration is a technique used to create interest in a story, but it's over-use (obviously subjective - some would call x over-exaggeration, some wouldn't) is over-exaggeration. Share.Writing is a powerful tool for communication, but even the most experienced writers can make mistakes. One common concern among writers is whether their sentences are grammatically correct and convey the intended meaning.evaluation suite for testing automatic grammatical error corrections - GitHub - cnap/grammaticality-metrics: evaluation suite for testing automatic ...Keywords. semantic anomaly, grammaticality, pragmatic infelicity, natural logic, polarity items, meaning shift. 1. INTRODUCTION. Linguists have learned a great deal about language by studying when things go wrong, for example, when an utterance is “weird.”. A major goal of modern syntax has been to find principles that rule out sentences ... 1. Both are correct. They can have different meanings. You are my favorite person, too. or. You are my favorite person too. This adds to a previous statement. Perhaps the addressee had told the speaker that he was his favorite person. Or perhaps the speaker had said that the addressee is a third party's favorite person.The word "contrast" conveys a stark difference in the degree to which two otherwise similar objects possess an attribute. Dark, depressing books and bonobos are too dissimilar to be in contrast, whereas the former do contrast with light hearted, trivial books.. If there is a valid context for comparison between the statistics and the figure, and this comparison …Grammaticality ratings were judged by the authors, and through crowd sourcing. A four-category ordinal scale is used for rating the sentences. To predict sentence acceptability, they apply a linear regression model that draws features from spelling errors, an N -gram model, precision grammar parsers, and the Stanford PCFG parser.Sep 16, 2020 · Welcome to EL&U, Sukessh. In most circumstances 'either' means 'any one of two'. For instance "You can have either the pink ball or the blue ball" means that you can have the pink ball or you can have the blue ball but you cannot have both. Oct 12, 2016 · Grammaticality ratings were judged by the authors, and through crowd sourcing. A four-category ordinal scale is used for rating the sentences. To predict sentence acceptability, they apply a linear regression model that draws features from spelling errors, an N -gram model, precision grammar parsers, and the Stanford PCFG parser. It is the insertion of a word into another word. In "a whole nother" the "a" and the "-nother" go together and the "whole" is slotted between them. It is exactly the same process you get with the common, but more vulgar, "Abso-fucking-lutely" or "unbe-fucking-lievable". For a humorous take on the subject: xkcd.OP makes it plain that valid sentences beginning with 'it' are the nub of the question. "It" functions as a pointer to something: No, it doesn't, often. See Dummy pronoun. It ("the nub of the question") may be best answered by pointing out that beginning sentences with "it" when the reference is unclear harms clarity.As the accepted answer implies, "product #55 has not sold" is a (possibly informal and/or grammatically "incorrect") abbreviation of "product #55 has not been sold". It may have been withdrawn from sale, or it may still be available but nobody has yet bought it. That usage would apply to a single item, which (obviously) can only be sold once.Collaborate is an intransitive verb that describes how people work together, not any process performed on an object. It then doesn't make sense, according to how collaborate is generally used, to say a project was collaborated: collaborate doesn't take an object. The sentence, though, clearly means that people collaborated on the project; it ...Grammaticality judgments reflect a compound product of both grammatical and processing factors. But because they interact in a symbiotic way, very often grammatical and processing constraints are difficult to separate. According to generally accepted grammatical theory, (a) ...grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs) concluded that untimed GJTs measure explicit knowledge (EK) and timed GJTs measure implicit knowledge (IK) (Bowles, 2011 ; R. Ellis, 2005 ; R. Ellis & Loewen ...This paper examines the role of age, working memory span and phonological ability in the mastery of ten different grammatical constructions. Six- through eleven-year-old children (n=68) and adults (n=19) performed a grammaticality judgment task as well as tests of working memory capacity and recepti … The reality of the language is such that both forms are used, on both sides of the Atlantic, but the bare-infinitive form is clearly preferred, as the stats from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the British National Corpus (BNC) illustrate:. COCA BNC all you have to do is [inf] 842 72 all you have to do is to [inf] 17 20Communicative Competence "In the mid to late 1960s awareness was increasing among applied linguists of the problem of over-emphasis on structural competence and insufficient attention paid to other dimensions of communicative competence, particularly appropriateness. [Leonard] Newmark (1966) is a clear example of this awareness, and his paper speaks of the student who may be entirely ...Syntactic Well-Formedness: Syntactic well-formedness refers to whether a sentence follows the rules and structure of a given language. In this case, the sentence is syntactically well-formed because it follows English word order and grammatical rules. It contains a subject ("colorless green ideas") and a verb ("sleep") in the appropriate order.Say you import apples, bananas, and grapes. The order of importation is apples, bananas, then grapes. Of in this context connects order with importation, indicating there is a sequence of imports. You could also say order of options, order of contestants, or order of numbers. Order in importation. Could be correct; can be used in certain cases.grammaticality - WordReference English dictionary, questions, discussion and forums. All Free.You can do it (i.e. it's grammatical), but it probably doesn't have the meaning you want. You are probably trying to say: Regarding the email below, I have sent all the required data to you.. This means that the required data is referenced in the email and you are responding to it by sending that data.The English tag question is made up of an auxiliary verb and a pronoun. The auxiliary has to agree with the tense, aspect and modality of the verb in the preceding sentence. If the verb is in the present perfect, for example, the tag question uses has or have; if the verb is in a present progressive form, the tag is formed with am, are, is; if ...1. "I'm home" means "I have arrived at home" (after being away for while, for instance after a trip, or after working in an office the whole day). In the phrase "I'm home", the word "home" is used as an adverb, not a noun. Compare the expression "to go home". Example: in the movie Star Wars: The Force Awakens, when Han Solo and Chewbacca set ...It isn't "a sense of perfect". "Perfect" is the name of an aspect of English grammar that uses "have" (present perfect) or "had" (past perfect) (e.g., I have seen that movie twice [and may see it again] and I had seen that movie twice before it was banned [but won't see it again]).I saw that movie twice before it was banned is the simple past, not the past perfect.Yes, "my bad" is a proper English phrase. It is an apology; when you say "my bad", you're basically saying, "I admit a mistake" or "my fault, sorry for that". Wiktionary says: (colloquial) (idiomatic) My fault; mea culpa. Yes, I realize the humvee isn't supposed to be parked in the heirloom flowerbed.Updated on November 28, 2020. In English grammar, "anaphora" is the use of a pronoun or other linguistic unit to refer back to another word or phrase. The adjective is anaphoric, and the term is also known by the phrases anaphoric reference or backward anaphora. A word that gets its meaning from a preceding word or phrase is called an anaphor.grammaticality; pronouns; subcontinental-english; dummy-it; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Sep 12, 2012 at 9:23. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Sep 12, 2012 at 6:29. Sandy8086 Sandy8086.There has been an improvement in/of Sally's performance in Mathematics from 3.0/4.0 to 3.2/4.0 and she is determined to further improve on/in her skills in this subject.. My choices: improvement in, improve on for the optional positions marked by /. improve on may mean additions as part of improvement, whereas improve in may mean improvement in efficiency, proficiency etc. without any ...informal a. at a considerable distance or extent: way over yonder b. very far: they're way up the mountain. informal by far; considerably: way better. slang truly; genuinely: they have a way cool site. It is not incorrect to say that something is way better or that you have way more of something, but it is not formal.1. After searching the corpus (millions of English texts), "considered as" (3,000) is significantly less used when compared to just "considered" (108,000). 3,000 uses is not insignificant, so it is difficult to say that it is necessarily "incorrect". I found some theoretical grammar difference, but it is largely not observed and writers often ...Well formed; in accordance with the rules of the grammar of a language. correct. acceptable. allowable. idiomatic. well formed. “It makes a grammatical sentence that correctly expresses the intended meaning.”. Find more words! Grammaticality judgment tests (GJTs) have been used to elicit data reflecting second language (L2) speakers’ knowledge of L2 grammar. However, the exact constructs measured by GJTs, whether primarily implicit or explicit knowledge, are disputed and have been argued to differ depending on test-related variables (i.e., time pressure and item grammaticality).1. Neither of those example sentence look entirely natural. I would rephrase it in one of two ways: She quickly said, "Hello," instead. Instead, she quickly said, "Hello." Which version would depend the context. (The style of the surrounding text, and so on.) Share. Improve this answer.Grammaticality and comprehensibility. As pointed out previously, grammar is not an absolute issue. While grammatical . accuracy exists as clear dichotomy, that is, grammatical or ungrammatical ...The Question: Is it acceptable to use a nominalized participle as an adjective? A participle is a verb form used as an adjective; examples include the running man and the caught ball, as well as (sorry for the self-reference) a verb form used as an adjective.. A nominalized adjective is an adjective that functions as a noun. One example of such is …Thus conceived, speaker–hearers are portrayed as individuals who possess linguistic knowledge and can provide judgments concerning the grammaticality of certain sentences Footnote 2 while it is generative linguists’ task to work out the system of rules that ‘expresses his [a native speaker’s] knowledge of his language’ Footnote 3 ...Grammaticality focuses on only the syntax and not the semantics. Grammaticality is how we know a sentence to work with respect to structure. Going back to that construction metaphor, if something is grammatical, then the beams are straight and true, everything is plumb, and the structure will stand. It doesn't tell you anything about the colors ...@Cameron - you saved my day! This is exactly what I was lurking for but couldn't find! I wanted to use "polysyndeton" because of a technical limitation that didn't allow me to put a comma after a word (it was comma after the HTML link which is not part of the link but some software would interpret it as a part of the link).common verb => official translation . google => "search the internet (using the Google brand search engine)" photoshop => "edit digital images (using the Adobe Photoshop brand image editing software)" facebook => "communicate (using the Facebook brand social networking website)". EDIT: to note that the parenthesized items can in some cases be replaced with something more generic, i ...30. One-to-one is used when you talk about transfer or communications. You may use one-to-one when you can identify a source and a destination. For eg., a one-to-one email is one sent from a single person to another, i.e., no ccs or bccs. In maths, a one-to-one mapping maps one element of a set to a unique element in a target set.Personally, I've used both versions. Nevertheless: Belated birthday is nonsense, since the anniversary is the anniversary, and cannot be postponed even if the celebrations are.; Belated happy birthday, strictly, is also nonsense because the birthday has already gone and may or may not have been happy.; Therefore I would suggest something along the lines of:Steric sea level (SSL) computed from hydrographic observations in the Mediterranean Sea is compared against altimetric sea level anomalies (SLA) at seasonal and inter-annual time scales for the ...Grammaticality, as one linguist explained it to me, means "following the rules of the relevant scientific model that is used to describe how people speak". So it is strictly dependent on the model used, but in practice many linguists presume that there is consensus about most elements of the relevant model, so it mostly overlaps with "people ...The past tense of put is put; the past tense of putt is putted. Since input is formed from "put" rather than "putt", it seems logical that its past tense should be input, rather than "inputted"; "inputted" sounds like a demented golfing term. Share. Improve this answer. Follow. edited May 21, 2014 at 16:50.For an epitaph, would you write: Her joy and love of life continue to inspire us all or Her joy and love of life continues to inspire us all TIAAs for User 2, opinions on grammaticality coming from anonymous speakers of anonymous languages in anonymous countries are another thing I frequently disregard. We see very strange (but equally strongly held) opinions on English grammaticality issued by English language students all the time here. -grammaticality; tense. Featured on Meta New colors launched. Practical effects of the October 2023 layoff. Linked. 0. Is "the first time" a type of signposting language or something like that? Related. 6. Tense to use for a past event that is still relevant at the present time ...Grammaticality definition: (of a sentence) the state or quality of being well formed; correctness | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples in American English 07‏/10‏/2023 ... Grammaticality has to do with well formedness of syntactic structures; grammaticality is usually considered as the structure of sentences ...Since there is no single official arbiter of American English, there is often disagreement among the various experts, particularly in areas that many regard as involving the finer or "more obscure" points of grammar. Discovery Activity 2 will help expand our discussion of grammaticality. Discovery Activity 2: More Decisions on Grammaticalitygrammaticality (countable and uncountable, plural grammaticalities) (linguistics) (of language) The state or attribute of obeying the rules of grammar; grammatical correctness.. Here note is a finite verb in the imperative: the subject i8. "Faster" is already a comparative, so to add another comp In that case, "solution" is the noun form of "solve". There's no need to take a noun derived from a verb and then derive yet another verb from that noun. You say "We are working on solving the problem", NOT "We are working on solutioning the problem." If by "solution" you mean a solid mixed into a liquid, then the verb is "dissolve". 2. You are going against common style guides that would have y Jan 8, 2016 · The construct validity of grammaticality judgment tests as measures of implicit and explicit knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 ( 3 ), 423 – 449. doi: 10.1017/S0272263113000041 CrossRef Google Scholar. Henning, G. ( 1987 ). A guide to language testing: Development, evaluation, research. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House. "Indeed" can start a sentence as either a conjunction or an...

Continue Reading